The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) takes effect on January 1, 2020 and imposes a wide range of new requirements for the collection and processing of personal data of California residents. Under the CCPA, “consumer” is defined broadly as a natural person who is a California resident. Assembly Bill 25 (“AB 25”), signed into law on October 11, 2019, provides a temporary and limited reprieve for employee data by establishing an exemption to the CCPA’s…
On September 24, 2018, the IRS issued Notice 2018-71 (Notice) on the temporary employer tax credit introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for wages paid to Qualifying Employees while on covered family or medical leave under new Section 45S of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). In brief: Where the requirements of the Notice are met, the new credit may be claimed during tax years 2018 and 2019 for paid family and medical leave…
Proxy advisors (e.g., Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) and Glass, Lewis & Co (“Glass Lewis”)) have played a substantial role in the design of executive compensation for many years. This has been due to the strong reliance of institutional investors (as well as investment advisors) on the proxy voting recommendations of firms such as ISS and Glass Lewis. Some commentators have viewed the proxy advisors as being quasi-regulators without any formal oversight of their potential conflicts…
On May 11th, the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued 45 Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (CDIs), replacing previously published telephone interpretations on proxy rules and Schedule 14A. Most of the updates are non-substantive, as noted by the SEC, and therefore the updates are primarily helpful for consolidating the relevant guidance in one place. Twelve of the CDIs relate to Item 10 of Schedule 14A, which sets forth the disclosure rules when a…
After an abrupt mid-year change, the IRS recently released Revenue Procedure 2018-27, which provides relief for employees with family coverage under a High Deductible Health Plan who also contribute to a Health Savings Account (HSA), by permitting such employees to use the previously announced $6,900 contribution limit for 2018 contributions. In May 2017, the IRS released Revenue Procedure 2017-37 which provided the annual inflation adjusted contribution limits for HSAs and stated that the 2018 contribution…
Join Baker McKenzie for a two-part webinar series to examine how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act impacts compensation and benefits arrangements maintained by both public and private companies and what actions your company needs to take. PART 1: From the PRIVATE Company’s Perspective | January 9, 2018 We will discuss the provisions with the biggest impact on private companies, including the introduction of a new income tax deferral regime for options and RSUs relating to “qualified stock.” PART 2:…
On December 13, 2017, the Delaware Supreme Court in In re Investors Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder Litigation issued a decision having significant ramifications on director compensation. The case increases the risk of plaintiff stockholder claims against directors based on a breach of fiduciary duties where directors grant themselves equity awards pursuant to a plan providing the directors with general discretion to determine the amount, terms, and conditions of the awards – even if the plan includes a stockholder-approved limit in the plan on the size of the awards that may be granted to directors.
The proposed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes some very concerning changes to the tax treatment of equity-based awards granted to U.S. taxpayers. Please review our alert on these changes. We will monitor the proposed bill closely so please check back frequently. Best regards, Barbara
The IRS recently issued guidance in Rev. Proc. 2017-28 addressing special rules that apply when employers seek a refund of FICA (social security and Medicare) taxes. This new guidance serves as a reminder to employers that special processes should be followed when seeking a refund of FICA taxes. Background As background, recall that FICA taxes are imposed on both the employer and the employee — half is paid directly by the employer and the other…
Where you have employer subsidized self-insured medical benefits being provided to highly compensated individuals (“HCIs”) after employment and that subsidy is only offered to HCIs, you run the risk that the actual medical benefits provided (not the premiums) may be taxable to the executive under 105(h).