The Singapore Budget 2025 is introducing a welcome change to the requirements for obtaining a tax deduction for share-based awards granted to employees in Singapore.

With effect from the Year of Assessment (YA) 2026, a tax deduction for such awards will be available also for awards that are settled with newly issued shares, not just treasury shares. Additional clarifications from the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) on the specific requirements and timing for the tax deduction are expected to become available by September 30, 2025.

Background

Under existing law, companies granting share-based awards to employees in Singapore could claim a tax deduction in Singapore for awards only if the awards were settled with treasury shares. The rationale for this rule was that a deduction should be available only for actual costs incurred by the company in relation to the awards. If settling awards with newly issued shares, companies were not perceived to incur an actual cost – even in situations where a Singapore subsidiary reimbursed a non-Singapore parent company for shares issued by the parent. 

By contrast, if the company settled awards with treasury shares, the company incurred a cost equal to the amount of the price paid to purchase the shares and such cost was generally deductible in Singapore (provided certain other conditions were met). In practice, this rule made it difficult for many companies to claim a tax deduction for share-based awards granted in Singapore. In some cases, local corporate law rules do not provide for the concept of treasury shares.  And even for companies that did or could purchase shares to be held in treasury, tracking the purchase price for such shares and matching it to the shares issued in satisfaction of awards granted in Singapore was extremely challenging. Therefore, again, few companies were able to claim tax deductions for share-based awards granted in Singapore. 

Update

Under the Singapore Budget 2025, it will now be possible for a Singapore company to claim a tax deduction for payments made to the parent or other holding company (or a special purpose vehicle) for newly issued shares of the parent company with effect from YA 2026.

A Singapore company will be allowed to claim a deduction for the lower of the following (in both cases minus any price paid by employees to acquire the shares):

(i) the amount paid by the Singapore company, and

(ii) the fair market value, or net asset value of the shares (if the fair market value is not readily available), at the time the shares are applied for the benefit of the employee. 

There are still a number of open questions that we expect the IRAS to provide guidance on by the third quarter of 2025. In particular, it is not clear if the new regime will apply as of January 1, 2025 (i.e., the beginning of the YA 2026) or a later date, and whether a deduction could be claimed only for share-based awards granted after the commencement of the new regime or for share-based awards settled after this date (even if granted before this date). Therefore, it may be premature for parent companies to enter into recharge agreements with their Singapore subsidiaries until further clarity is obtained on the precise mechanics for the administration of the new regime.

Our Singapore colleagues are currently engaging with IRAS, to ensure all open issues will be addressed in the IRAS’ expected guidance. If you have any questions or comments with respect to the forthcoming guidance, please contact your Compensation attorney.

Relatedly, IRAS has taken the position that notional stock-based compensation (SBC) expenses are to be included in the cost base when computing service fees that are to be charged by a Singapore company to an intercompany affiliate where a cost-plus methodology is adopted. IRAS has taken this position even in situations where the notional SBC expenses are recorded on the Singapore subsidiary’s books solely from an accounting perspective and there is no actual recharge that has been incurred by the Singapore subsidiary to the issuing company for the shares. If the notional SBC expenses are included in the cost base, this increases the service fees that are to be recognized by the Singapore company. If there is no corresponding deduction for the Singapore subsidiary, the increase to taxable income could potentially be material. It is therefore important to consider the implications of the historical and prospective SBC arrangement in order to mitigate the Singapore tax exposure, such as through implementing a recharge arrangement claiming a tax deduction for the shares under the new regime if conditions are met. 

To access our Singapore office’s client alert on all relevant tax updates introduced by Singapore Budget 2025, please see here.

Author

Allen Tan is the Head of the Tax, Trade and Wealth Management practice at Baker McKenzie Wong & Leow. He has extensive experience working on both international and local tax issues, with a special focus on the regional tax aspects of the transactions that he is involved in. Allen’s clients include Global Fortune 500 multinational corporations and major Singapore and Asian conglomerates.

Author

Dawn Quek is a leading tax and private client lawyer in Singapore with more than two decades of experience in corporate tax and international tax planning. She is the Head of the Wealth Management practice in Singapore and is the Asia Pacific representative on the Firm's Global Wealth Management Steering Committee. She works with ultra high net worth families and their family offices on international tax planning, estate and succession planning, family governance, and philanthropy.

Author

Paula Levy is a partner in the Tax Practice, based in Palo Alto. She has been a member of Baker McKenzie’s Global Tax Practice since 2012. Paula advises US-based and non-US-based multinationals and other companies on US federal income tax issues, with a focus on international tax planning. Paula has experience representing technology, pharmaceutical, medical device, and other companies in a variety of tax planning matters, including domestic and cross-border M&A and joint ventures, structuring international operations, subpart F planning, foreign tax credit planning, tax treaty planning, and transfer pricing. She has particular experience in advising companies on changes of domicile and IP planning.

Author

Gary is a partner with Baker McKenzie based in Palo Alto. His practice focuses on advice to software, digital services and high-tech companies. Early involvement in international tax policy matters included serving as chair of the business representatives selected by the OECD to participate in the OECD Technical Advisory Group on Tax Treaty Characterisation Issues Arising from E-Commerce. He also was appointed by the OECD to serve as the business co-chair on the Technical Advisory Group on Monitoring the Application of Existing Treaty Norms for the Taxation of Business Profits. He was the Co-General Reporter for the subject Taxation of Income Derived from Electronic Commerce for the International Fiscal Association 2001 Congress, and is a co-author of BNA Tax Management Portfolio No. 555, Federal Taxation of Software and E-Commerce. He was the General Reporter for the subject Big Data and Tax – Domestic and International Taxation of Data Driven Business for the International Fiscal Association 2022 Congress. He has published over 100 articles on various U.S. and international tax topics. He serves as adjunct professor of tax law at UC College of the Law, San Francisco. Recently he was invited to testify in front of the U.S. House Ways & Means Subcommittee on Tax regarding the proposed Pillar 1 revisions to the international tax framework. Gary focuses his practice on international corporate tax planning and advice, tax controversies and tax issues affecting software, high technology and digital enterprise companies.

Author

Barbara Klementz is the chair of Baker McKenzie’s North American Compensation Practice. She has practiced in the area of global equity and executive compensation for over 20 years. Barbara is a Thomson Reuters Stand-out Lawyer for 2024 and recognized as a ranked practitioner by Legal 500 for Employee Benefits: Transactional and by Chambers USA. Client feedback in Chambers states that "Barbara is absolutely phenomenal" and "Barbara is incredibly impressive in terms of expertise and the ability to be pragmatic and practical. She knows the laws and rules in a staggering number of countries." Barbara is admitted to private practice in California and Düsseldorf, Germany. Barbara focuses her practice on global equity compensation programs, executive compensation and employee benefits. She regularly advises multinational companies on implementing their equity compensation and other incentive programs worldwide – particularly as it relates to tax and securities law matters and exchange control regulations. Barbara also frequently advises on the treatment of such programs in corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, spin-offs and divestitures, as well as on the tax treatment of cross-border employees participating in such programs.